I have done a silhouette comparison of the Bungalow Sidewall with that of several of our additions (file attached) for our analysis. 

• JM44: The Foundation, Base Floor work, and floor to ceiling match.  The roof angle of the JM44 is steeper than the Bungalow which makes it stick up higher.  The Roof angle could be customized in the JM44 and the Peak Sidewall eliminated or similarly customized for use on the Bungalow.  The windows do not match.


• E1600:  The Foundation, Base Floor, and floor to ceiling match.  The overall size is too big and would need a lot of customizing to be used on the Bungalow, but the size of the parts would allow for that customization with the right tools, patience and design work.  The advantage of the E1600 is that it can be purchased as an un-routed shell (no window hole or window) so a window could be customized to match the Bungalow


• JM66: The Conservatory does not need to match in any way to aesthetically work with the bungalow.  The shorter foundation and taller floor to ceiling are expected in a Conservatory; it would only need some customization where the Bungalow overhangs its foundation and the Conservatory Foundation is shorter so there will be a small void.  The Conservatory Ceiling would have to be carved to fit under the Bungalow Eave in front and the Railings modified to fit.  The Conservatory has smooth, stucco walls

Each of these could be made to work, some with a very little cutting (JM66) and the others with more.  The milling (clapboard) of each of the milled products has the same profile. Note that an addition on the side with the stairs will have interference between the bottom of the stairs and a doorway cut into the addition. Consider cutting the stairhole 1" closer to the Front.